 |
08-26-2008, 07:51 PM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 8
|
is copper really this much better then stainless chillers
|
|
i'm looking at upgrading my chiller and i've found that stainless IC chillers are cheaper then copper. So ok they probably don't chill as well as copper and the question becomes how much better is copper then stainless at chilling wort.
i found this link that shows the thermal conductivity of various materials and copper has about 10X the thermal conductivity over stainless. does that mean it will take 10' of stainless for every 1' of copper to cool the same amount of wort?
Thermal Conductivity of Metals
Copper, pure 68 223
Stainless Steel 68 7-26
|
|
|
|
08-26-2008, 07:58 PM
|
#2
|
|
For the love of beer!
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 11,850
Liked 42 Times on 36 Posts
Likes Given: 28
|
It's probably not that simple.
But look at the 100s of chillers on here and the 100s of experienced brewers and look what they are using.
|
|
|
|
|
08-26-2008, 08:14 PM
|
#3
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kanatenah
Posts: 1,431
Liked 16 Times on 14 Posts
Likes Given: 3
|
Copper is one of the best heat conductors out there. Will be much more efficient then stainless.
Heat transfer is based on a lot of things, not just length of tubing. (flowrate, temps, thickness of tubing, length, turbulence, etc.)
|
|
|
|
|
08-26-2008, 08:42 PM
|
#4
|
|
Conqueroo Brew
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,445
Liked 6 Times on 6 Posts
Likes Given: 31
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by allgrain
i found this link that shows the thermal conductivity of various materials and copper has about 10X the thermal conductivity over stainless. does that mean it will take 10' of stainless for every 1' of copper to cool the same amount of wort?
|
No, because the walls of the stainless tubing are substantially thinner than copper tubing of the same diameter. My stainless chiller is light as a feather. And while I haven't done any precise tests, I don't notice it being any slower than my comparably sized copper chiller.
I bought it because I prefer stainless, not because it was cheaper. (Actually, it wasn't cheaper at the time!) |
|
|
|
|
08-26-2008, 08:43 PM
|
#5
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Taunton, MA
Posts: 1,878
Liked 24 Times on 20 Posts
|
The chillers that I worked on in the HVAC trade all had tube and shell heat exchangers in which the tubes were always made of copper. The only exception was in the generators of lithium bromide absorption chillers where the tubes were exposed to a very high temperature, highly concentrated salt solution. Even then, the tubes were not stainless steel, they were made from a copper/nickel alloy. So when it comes to the transfer of heat, copper rules.
__________________
Cheers,
John
|
|
|
|
|
08-27-2008, 01:17 AM
|
#6
|
|
Vendor and Brewer
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Piscataway, NJ
Posts: 20,661
Liked 460 Times on 325 Posts
Likes Given: 8
|
What kind of price differences are you seeing? 50 feet of 1/2" OD copper is like $50 shipped.
__________________
BrewHardware.com
Sightglass, Refractometer, Ball Valve, Weldless bulkhead, Thermometer, Decals, Stainless Steel Fittings, Compression Fittings, Camlock Quick Disconnects, Scale, RIMS tube, Plate Chiller, Chugger Pump, Super Clear Silicone Tubing, and more!
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
|
|
|
.gif-1367621329.gif)
