Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Equipment/Sanitation > brutus type brewing rig question




Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-17-2012, 06:02 PM   #1
Senior Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
2BeerSpeer's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Mt. Airy, NC
Posts: 567
Liked 26 Times on 22 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default brutus type brewing rig question

I curious or the pros and cons for 1 1/2 versus 2 inch square tubing....Thanks in advance


__________________
__________


Keg #1 --- Barrel Aged Burnt Whiskers
Keg #2 --- WAGZ IIPA
Keg #3 --- Dickens Cider
Keg #4 --- Barrel Aged Burnt Whiskers- Nitro
Keg #5 --- Highland Brewing Co. Cold Mtn. Winter Ale .....1/6th barrel
2BeerSpeer is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-17-2012, 10:37 PM   #2
BrewSteel Brew Stands
HomeBrewTalk 2012 Vendor Giveaway Participate
Vendor Ads 
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
OneHoppyGuy's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 1,701
Liked 31 Times on 27 Posts
Likes Given: 47

Default

Depends on the span and size of kettles. 1.75 is a good choice in mild steel (hard to find and expensive in stainless) for most upper rails. Lower rail can be 1.5 x 1 or 2 x 1. Legs at 1.5 are plenty. Center vertical supports do little if anything.
Some stands (MoreBeer) are built with 2 x 1 upper rail and legs.


__________________
Brewright. All Rights Reserved. We reserve the right to brew and to help you brew. To protect the brew and defend the brew. To make the brew and drink the brew.

BrewSteel.com
BrewSteel on Facebook
OneHoppyGuy is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-18-2012, 05:02 AM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Stow, MA
Posts: 5,350
Liked 305 Times on 267 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OneHoppyGuy View Post
[...]Center vertical supports do little if anything.[...]
You've posted that thought frequently. What's it based upon? Seems to me nearly halving the upper rail deflection actually is "doing quite a bit".

As for the op's question, I've seen some pretty big kettles sitting on 1.5" square tubing. I think you'd need to be doing rather huge batches to justify going to 2" square, and taking the weight and cost hits...

Cheers!
day_trippr is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-18-2012, 06:39 AM   #4
BrewSteel Brew Stands
HomeBrewTalk 2012 Vendor Giveaway Participate
Vendor Ads 
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
OneHoppyGuy's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 1,701
Liked 31 Times on 27 Posts
Likes Given: 47

Default

based on experience... I built several prototypes (wanna buy a prototype?)
Really?
If you bought steel on a regular basis you wouldn't say that... (pennies different in cost)
If you want extra bracing, run a tube diagonally from the center down to either end.
__________________
Brewright. All Rights Reserved. We reserve the right to brew and to help you brew. To protect the brew and defend the brew. To make the brew and drink the brew.

BrewSteel.com
BrewSteel on Facebook
OneHoppyGuy is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-18-2012, 03:30 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Stow, MA
Posts: 5,350
Liked 305 Times on 267 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OneHoppyGuy View Post
based on experience... I built several prototypes (wanna buy a prototype?)
Well, your experience that led you to conclude a center support tying top to bottom rails does little to nothing wrt top rail deflection pretty much defies the whole principle of elastic modulus. Considering how many structures like bridges, buildings and even furniture have been built using that principle, I think I'd follow the science over inexplicably contrary experience.

As for buying steel on a regular basis or in large quantities, I don't, so on that at least I'd defer to your experience

Cheers!
day_trippr is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-18-2012, 03:42 PM   #6
I'm no atheist scientist, but...
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Thiensville, Wisconsin
Posts: 5,996
Liked 148 Times on 135 Posts
Likes Given: 268

Default

day_trippr, can you show your work that led you to believe that by not including a vertical support his stand is being stressed outside the elastic range? also, i don't understand how by him not welding a vert support is "defying the whole principle of elastic modulus"

also...how much for a proto stand??
__________________
Quote:
The man who intoxicates himself on bad whisky is sometimes moved to kill his wife and set his house on fire, but the victim of applejack is capable of blowing up a whole town with dynamite and of reciting original poetry to every surviving inhabitant.

– "A Wicked Beverage," New York Times, April 10, 1894
"srsly, not intended to threadjack (big hairy)"
motobrewer is online now
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-19-2012, 03:44 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Stow, MA
Posts: 5,350
Liked 305 Times on 267 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by motobrewer View Post
day_trippr, can you show your work that led you to believe that by not including a vertical support his stand is being stressed outside the elastic range? also, i don't understand how by him not welding a vert support is "defying the whole principle of elastic modulus"

also...how much for a proto stand??
One of the problems with language is so few people are skilled at using it.

I actually never said anything that could be interpreted as "stressed outside the elastic range". Aside from such curious creativity on your part, that would be applying absolutes to what was clearly more a philosophical discussion.

Allow me to clarify the discussion at hand.

Mister Brewstand has frequently made the statement "Center vertical supports do little if anything", without providing any clarity of how that statement should be interpreted.

I took it to mean that tying one tier to a second tier would have no effect on weight-induced deflection. Certainly such a view would be silly, even if only applying common sense, never mind physical science.

But perhaps what he really meant was there wasn't a need for vertical ties from upper to lower spans - that the upper span of a stand would have sufficient intrinsic weight-bearing capability that tying it to a lower span is unnecessary.

If the latter interpretation was his intent, that's a totally different meaning, and one with which I might well have agreed, given a certain set of assumptions, of course.

Otoh, if he really believes the former...well, me, common sense and the physical sciences will stand securely on the other side of the question.

So, while it's still a mystery to me what the actual statement is/was supposed to convey, I hope this helps you understand my response...

Cheers!
day_trippr is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-19-2012, 01:32 PM   #8
I'm no atheist scientist, but...
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Thiensville, Wisconsin
Posts: 5,996
Liked 148 Times on 135 Posts
Likes Given: 268

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by day_trippr View Post
One of the problems with language is so few people are skilled at using it.

blah blah

But perhaps what he really meant was there wasn't a need for vertical ties from upper to lower spans - that the upper span of a stand would have sufficient intrinsic weight-bearing capability that tying it to a lower span is unnecessary.
yeah, i understand it perfectly. you are trying to sound smart without really saying anything at all.

if you thought he was talking about anything other than that, I'd say you are the one "unskilled at using language".
__________________
Quote:
The man who intoxicates himself on bad whisky is sometimes moved to kill his wife and set his house on fire, but the victim of applejack is capable of blowing up a whole town with dynamite and of reciting original poetry to every surviving inhabitant.

– "A Wicked Beverage," New York Times, April 10, 1894
"srsly, not intended to threadjack (big hairy)"
motobrewer is online now
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-19-2012, 01:36 PM   #9
Senior Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
2BeerSpeer's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Mt. Airy, NC
Posts: 567
Liked 26 Times on 22 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

wow, quite a thead I started....It will cost me $68 in tubing for 1 1/2" and $84 for 2"...I don't mind paying the extra just wanted to see if there was any real disadvantages to using 2"...I think the keggles look a lot better on the beefy frame but hate to use it if its gonna cause issues!
__________________
__________


Keg #1 --- Barrel Aged Burnt Whiskers
Keg #2 --- WAGZ IIPA
Keg #3 --- Dickens Cider
Keg #4 --- Barrel Aged Burnt Whiskers- Nitro
Keg #5 --- Highland Brewing Co. Cold Mtn. Winter Ale .....1/6th barrel
2BeerSpeer is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-19-2012, 01:37 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
freshhoarse's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: West Berlin, New Jersey
Posts: 314
Liked 8 Times on 7 Posts
Likes Given: 5

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2BeerSpeer
I curious or the pros and cons for 1 1/2 versus 2 inch square tubing....Thanks in advance
Lol. Bet you're sorry you asked....


freshhoarse is online now
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kettle vs Keggle-brutus type build schristian619 Equipment/Sanitation 13 01-14-2010 05:20 PM
Brewing on Brutus Ten... Lonnie Mac Equipment/Sanitation 18 09-08-2009 02:58 AM
Brutus 10 type system help JSomps6 Equipment/Sanitation 9 08-25-2009 06:58 PM
Quick disconnects for Brutus type system sleepystevenson Equipment/Sanitation 4 08-12-2008 05:33 PM
Type of Burner for brewing Sherpa FE Equipment/Sanitation 1 11-05-2007 10:40 PM



FOLLOW US ON