Advertise Here
Main · BrewSpace · Recipes · Wiki · Groups · Clubs · Gallery · Reviews · Video · Blogs · Store

Memorial Day Sale KegCoStorewide Sale! - Kegconnection.comMemorial Day False Bottom Free Shipping
Go Back   Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Equipment/Sanitation



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-19-2009, 07:46 PM   #1
Senior Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 137
Default 61% percent efficiency without sparge ?

That is good enough isn't it ?

Or am calculating it wrong ?

I use grain from Warminster:

4Kg / 8.8lbs Mild Ale Malt
500g / 1.1lbs Crystal Malt
300g / 0.7lbs High Crystal Malt
300g / 0.7lbs Chocolate Malt

OG = 1.051 (post boil)
Volume = 19L / 4.94 US gallon (post boil)

Thank you, (Fuller London Porter, btw)
walther



Last edited by walther; 04-19-2009 at 08:17 PM.
walther is offline Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2009, 08:45 PM   #2
Senior Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Milton, De
Posts: 2,140
Default

why didnt you sparge?
__________________
On Hiatus: Brewing at work....
scinerd3000 is offline Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2009, 09:38 PM   #3
Senior Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,012
Default

Yes, it's good enough and very good for a no-sparge method if that's what you actually did. Don't worry about efficiency. It's not that big of a deal. If you hit your desired OG you're good to go. I only get about 72% on my mid-range gravity beers, but it's an honest 72%.
Catt22 is offline Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 02:39 PM   #4
Senior Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 137
Default

Hi,

Thank you for the replies,

The reason I do not sparge is because it would require more equipment, and take longer time (both could be argued as being good things, I know ).
I add all the water from the beginning (EndVolume+BoilOff+DeadSpace+GrainAbsorb=25L), and circulate it through a large sieve during the mash, and end up with 19L. Very easy, and fairly efficient.

Thank you,
walther
walther is offline Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 02:52 PM   #5
Senior Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,620
Default

You have some very HIGH quality wort there. First wort, is the best wort... the longer you sparge, the more undesireable stuff comes from the grain.

Efficiency is nothing more than a number. If you want to use LESS grain to reach the same OG, then worry about eff. If you dont care, do what you like, but remember, no sparge will give you GREAT wort! Low PH, high sugar content and no nasty tannins.

Good job.


The Pol is offline Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Efficiency with Fly-Sparge SteveG All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 13 11-15-2008 06:44 AM
Some AG Q's: Efficiency/Mashout/Sparge bgcoving All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 7 06-01-2008 12:48 AM
92% batch sparge efficiency? Huh Bobby_M All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 7 11-11-2007 03:52 AM
No sparge efficiency... and more RedSun General Techniques 3 08-13-2007 04:11 PM
Sparge efficiency G. Cretin General Techniques 3 07-25-2006 05:19 PM





Contact Us - Top - Privacy - All times are GMT. The time now is 03:30 PM.
Copyright © Group Builder, Inc - All Rights Reserved
Craft Beer & Brewery Forum